|
Office ChatWhat’s happening at work? |
Latham is not top 10 in terms of RPL or PPP, in addition to not being a top 10 as ranked by Vault. Latham's decline is happening faster than I thought.
Guest | Apr 30, 2010
Guest | Apr 30, 2010
That NY is hiring anyone after laying off more than 100 associates in that office alone last year is pretty ridiculous.
Someone panicked.
Guest | Apr 7, 2010
Someone panicked.
Guest | Apr 7, 2010
Latham Lathams accrued vacation?
Guest | Mar 30, 2010
Guest | Mar 30, 2010
About the switch to unlimited vacation days.
Latham planning for mass departures or something?
Guest | Mar 30, 2010
Latham planning for mass departures or something?
Guest | Mar 30, 2010
Missing a redwell full of important docs. Please find your way back into my life.
Guest | Mar 16, 2010
Guest | Mar 16, 2010
Filling out my march madness bracket.
Guest | Mar 15, 2010
Guest | Mar 15, 2010
Corp group is hiring in NYC. I interviewed three people last week. It is about time.
Guest | Mar 15, 2010
Guest | Mar 15, 2010
Trying to catch a nap. Keep getting interrupted.
Guest | Mar 10, 2010
Guest | Mar 10, 2010
Promotes cooperation. Also, compensation differences among the associates might be arbitrary otherwise. Bonus payments sometimes are.
Guest | Feb 17, 2010
Guest | Feb 17, 2010
necessary.
Guest | Feb 17, 2010
Guest | Feb 17, 2010
For the firm slogan, how about:
"I can't believe I turned down [insert firm name]"
Guest | Feb 15, 2010
"I can't believe I turned down [insert firm name]"
Guest | Feb 15, 2010
Which would be a better Latham slogan
"Latham is well diversified,"
or
"There will be no layoffs."
Guest | Feb 14, 2010
"Latham is well diversified,"
or
"There will be no layoffs."
Guest | Feb 14, 2010
YOUR ALL FIRED!!!!
Guest | Feb 14, 2010
Guest | Feb 14, 2010
Lockstep for base, fine. Bonuses at LW have always been somewhat arbitrary.
WhoDat | Feb 8, 2010
WhoDat | Feb 8, 2010
Suggestion Box
Share anonymous ideas and feedback
0 |
0
Vote!
Anonymous Employee |
Feb 14, 2010
|
0 replies
0 replies
Feb 2 I agree with you about the efficacy of the associates committee. My impression of them is that they're mostly yes men (and women). I don't think the partners really want our input on major decisions. The associates committee seems to be in part a marketing tool and also a way to get us to buy into firm decisions under the guise that we contributed to them.
