|
Office ChatWhat’s happening at work? |
when are they announcing new partners?
Guest | Apr 6, 2010
Guest | Apr 6, 2010
test
Guest | Mar 12, 2010
Guest | Mar 12, 2010
No I didn't go to a law school in the top 20 and have had a complex about being out-performed all my life. This is why I need lockstep.
LT | Feb 5, 2010
LT | Feb 5, 2010
if you're worried about looking over your shoulder, you should be. $50 bucks you went to either Harvard or Yale.
Guest | Feb 2, 2010
Guest | Feb 2, 2010
PPP were down last year and will likely go down again. Partners are getting less. Your post makes no sense.
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
I think that partners are greedy, won't share the wealth, and smart lawyers will leave. I hope their PPP goes down...
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
This isn't law school. It's big business. Why shouldn't you be paid based on your work product/value-add to the firm?
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
Guest | Jan 28, 2010
Lockstep not going anywhere.
Guest | Jan 27, 2010
Guest | Jan 27, 2010
Uh oh, here come the tales of how hard it is to be employed in this economy and making what we make.
Guest | Jan 26, 2010
Guest | Jan 26, 2010
Working at a firm is hard enough without having to look over your shoulder at all your classmates. No reason to tamper with lockstep.
LT | Jan 26, 2010
LT | Jan 26, 2010
Suggestion Box
Share anonymous ideas and feedback
0 |
0
Vote!
Guest |
Feb 11, 2010
|
0 replies
0 replies
Allen Overy has come up with a solution. Four-day week / 52 days off annually (choose one) and with reduced hours comes reduced partnership profits. Brilliant.
